[Grml] removal of "buffer" command? alternatives?

Ulrich Dangel mru at grml.org
Wed Dec 28 02:28:13 CET 2011

* Tom {Tomcat} Oehser wrote [28.12.11 00:45]:

> Hmmm... 'atop' also?  Not as bad as 'buffer', but, I'm having withdrawal.
Yes, have a look at htop instead.

> Is there a list of what was removed?
Yes, you can either create your own list by comapring the dpkg selection
files or use
which has a removed section 

> I'm unconvinced that filling 50% of iso images with unused stuff
> (64 unused on 32, 32 unused on 64...) is an ideal trade-off.  I'm
> just sayin...

Hm? The default images are 64bit or 32bit only.


More information about the Grml mailing list