[Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

Michael Prokop mika at grml.org
Mon Jun 15 12:04:15 CEST 2009

Hi grml users,

especially on grml64 we are running out of space and I'm thinking
about removing LaTeX from grml, which would save us 100MB of
uncompressed space.

I'm talking about the following Debian packages:

| auctex catdvi ctioga dvipng gnuhtml2latex lacheck latex-beamer
| latexmk latex-mk latextug latex-xcolor libkpathsea4 libtioga-ruby
| libtioga-ruby1.8 pdfjam pgf preview-latex-style tetex-bin tex-common
| texify texlive texlive-base texlive-base-bin texlive-common
| texlive-doc-base texlive-extra-utils texlive-fonts-recommended
| texlive-lang-german texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended
| texpower tth vim-latexsuite

I'd like to know *your* opinion on this issue, so please let us know
your opinion through this poll:



 http://grml.org/            # Linux for texttool-users and sysadmins
 http://wiki.grml.org/       # share your knowledge
 http://grml.supersized.org/ # the grml development weblog
 #grml @ irc.freenode.org    # meet us on irc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ml.grml.org/pipermail/grml/attachments/20090615/2504f052/attachment-0003.pgp>

More information about the Grml mailing list