[issue1212] Which licenses?

Mikko V. Viinamäki bts at bts.grml.org
Tue Sep 25 11:39:27 CEST 2012


Mikko V. Viinamäki <Mikko.Viinamaki at students.turkuamk.fi> added the comment:

Proprietary firmware is proprietary.

vrms is very incomplete and misleading since it's named after rms, yet it follows the dfsg...

The bug is the lack of licensing info on the homepage.
________________________________________
From: Michael Prokop [bts at bts.grml.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:08 AM
To: Mikko V. Viinamäki
Subject: [issue1212] Which licenses?

Michael Prokop <mika at grml.org> added the comment:

No, Grml doesn't contain proprietary software (unless your definition of
proprietary software contains some selected firmware packages from non-free,
install vrms and see yourselve).

PS: This is a *bug* tracker :)

----------
priority:  -> wish
status: unread -> resolved

_____________________________________
GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
<http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1212>
_____________________________________

----------
messages: 4459, 4460, 4462
nosy: Mikko.Viinamaki
priority: wish
status: chatting
title: Which licenses?

_____________________________________
GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
<http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1212>
_____________________________________


More information about the Bugs-changes mailing list