[Grml-devel] Discussion: Add ncurses-term to GRMLBASE or only GRML_FULL

Markus "bionix" Ulrich bionix at grml.org
Thu Dec 13 14:29:43 CET 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello guys,

we have the bts issue 1220 [1] and mika said to the topic, that maybe
it's better to add the package ncurses-term to GRMLBASE instead to
GRML_FULL.

The packages is also in GRML_XL.

So, let the discussion begin...

What is your opinion to the topic?

I added two commits on my branch bionix/ncurses and after our choice,
we can cherry-pick/merge the right commit into master.

So, please think short about it and tell us our thinking.

Github commit for GRMLBASE and removing from GRML_FULL: [2]
Github commit for only GRML_FULL: [3]

URLs:
[1] http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1220
[2] http://git.io/IAIbYg
[3] http://git.io/OQDavg

Regards,
- -- 

- - bionix -
GRML -- http://grml.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=YqAy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Grml-devel mailing list