[issue1300] 2014.03: grml2ram fails because of too less RAM despite there is plenty
Walter Haidinger
bts at bts.grml.org
Thu Apr 3 13:03:43 CEST 2014
Walter Haidinger <walter.haidinger at greentube.com> added the comment:
If the check is dropped (i.e. by using --force or commenting out), grml2ram
succeeds as expected.
However isn't the RAM check just a sanity check after all?
If so, something like MemFree-(Buffers-Cached)*0.9 > grmlsize would make sense.
----------
messages: 4774, 4775, 4776
nosy: whaid
priority: wish
status: chatting
title: 2014.03: grml2ram fails because of too less RAM despite there is plenty
_____________________________________
GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
<http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1300>
_____________________________________
More information about the Bugs-changes
mailing list