[issue1140] Current GRML has less function that previous GRML

[Daniel Walton]

Daniel Walton <daniel.walton at gmail.com> added the comment:

ok thanks. I'll look into it and see what I can do to help.

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Michael Prokop <bts at bts.grml.org> wrote:

>
> Michael Prokop <mika at grml.org> added the comment:
>
> Hi,
>
> we had this issue several times on our mailing lists (see e.g.
> http://ml.grml.org/pipermail/grml-devel/2011-December/000219.html),
> started an
> initiative to gather help (http://grml.github.com/), etc...
>
> If there's any tool relevant for sysadmin stuff missing in Grml we're
> happy to
> (re-)include it. But with the current manpower the old 700MB Grml ISO
> (featuring
> way more than just sysadmin stuff) won't come back.
>
> regards,
> -mika-
>
> ----------
> priority:  -> wish
> status: unread -> chatting
>
> _____________________________________
> GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
> <http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1140>
> _____________________________________
>

----------
files: unnamed, unnamed
messages: 4288, 4293, 4294
nosy: daniel.walton
priority: wish
status: wont-fix
title: Current GRML has less function that previous GRML

_____________________________________
GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
<http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue1140>
_____________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ml.grml.org/pipermail/bugs-changes/attachments/20120216/f236c014/attachment.html>