[issue897] evaluate inclusion of colfm

[Michael Prokop]

Michael Prokop <mika at grml.org> added the comment:

* Frank Terbeck wrote in grml's BTS on 20101026 / 23:51:

> > ACK. Suggestions for removals? (fvwm-crystal is pretty high on my
> > consider-for-removal nowadays.)

> Well, actually, all the ones you can't use out of the box from the
> live-media. 

> I don't have the complete list right now. But last time I tried, awesome
> on the live-cd was pretty damn near useless to me. (Don't get me wrong,
> it's a nice piece of software when you had the time to configure it to
> your taste. But the setup from our last release didn't make it useful at
> all.)

Good point.

> fvwm-crystal should probably go, yes.

> I'd need to check out most of the WMs again, to get a descent proposal
> for removal. But the ones that struck me as usable where, fluxbox and
> openbox (I think).

I think we should come up with a list of WMs (as well as other
software!) we consider for removal and ask our users for feedback.
I justed added that to the todolist for the upcoming developer
meeting, thanks!

regards,
-mika-

----------
files: unnamed
messages: 3334, 3337, 3400, 3401, 3407, 3408, 3409, 3410
nosy: ft, mru
priority: wish
status: chatting
title: evaluate inclusion of colfm
topic: grml-etc-core

_____________________________________
GRML issue tracker <bts at bts.grml.org>
<http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue897>
_____________________________________